Mobility Radeon HD 5165 vs GeForce GT 520MX
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 520MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is positioned at rank 449 and the GeForce GT 520MX is on rank 434, so the GeForce GT 520MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 520MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 520MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 5165.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 520MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 520MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 53.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 5165 and GeForce GT 520MX
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.
GeForce GT 520MX
The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 scores 284 and the GeForce GT 520MX reaches 291 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 520MX uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) vs 384 (GeForce GT 520MX). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 284 | 291+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+51% | 0.7427 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB+150% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.0+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.0+21% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 520MX's 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 520MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) vs 350W (GeForce GT 520MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.7 | 5.8+2% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 520MX launched at $45 and now averages $10. The GeForce GT 520MX costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) vs 29.1 (GeForce GT 520MX) — the GeForce GT 520MX offers 54% better value. The GeForce GT 520MX is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 5165 | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $45-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9 | 29.1+54% |
| Codename | Broadway | GK107 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #846 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 5165 and GeForce GT 520MX
