Mobility Radeon HD 530v vs Quadro FX 1500

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1500

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 530v vs Quadro FX 1500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 530v vs Quadro FX 1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $650 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1368.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1500

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1326.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 530v is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (175 vs 170), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 530v is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 530v makes the most sense to buy today. It is $650 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1368.5% (3.6 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon HD 530v vs Quadro FX 1500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 175 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1500

The Quadro FX 1500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v scores 175 and the Quadro FX 1500 reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 530v is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 1500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 530v) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1500). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 530v) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1500).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 530vQuadro FX 1500
G3D Mark Score
175+3%
170
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+233%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+80%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 530vQuadro FX 1500
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1500 carries 256 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 530v gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 530v and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1500.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 530vQuadro FX 1500
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1500's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 530v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 530v) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 530vQuadro FX 1500
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
3.5+289%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 530v came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 1500 launched at $699. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 530v was 93% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 530v) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 1500) — the Mobility Radeon HD 530v offers 1700% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 530v (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 530vQuadro FX 1500
MSRP
$49-93%
$699
Performance per Dollar
3.6+1700%
0.2
Codename
Broadway
GT200B
Release
January 7 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#846
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.