
Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

Quadro FX 4000
Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 vs Quadro FX 4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 vs Quadro FX 4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 vs Quadro FX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4210% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 4000
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌4387.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 vs Quadro FX 4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200
The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 97 points.

Quadro FX 4000
The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 scores 97 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 97 | 101+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+317% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+90% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4000 carries 256 MB. Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4000. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4000) — the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+357% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 was 97.8% cheaper ($2150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 4000) — the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-98% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | M98 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2009 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #927 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














