Mobility Radeon X1450 vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X1450 vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon X1450 vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X1450

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (33 vs 5,983).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅+18030.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 13329.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 18030.3% in PassMark G3D (5,983 vs 33), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $35 more expensive on MSRP at $135 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 13329.9% (44.3 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon X1450 vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1450

The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1450 scores 33 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the RTX A400 leads by 18030.3%. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1450	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	33	5,983+18030%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Ampere
Process Node	40 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	800+4%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	2.706 TFLOPS+142%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+67%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1450	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon X1450 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 carries 4 GB. RTX A400 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1450 and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1450	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	4 GB+3100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1450 draws 50W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1450	RTX A400
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.7	119.7+17000%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1450 came in at $100, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1450 was 25.9% cheaper ($35 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 14666.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2010).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1450	RTX A400
MSRP	$100-26%	$135
Performance per Dollar	0.3	44.3+14667%
Codename	Broadway	GA107
Release	January 7 2010	April 16 2024
Ranking	#846	#397

Search Mobility Radeon X1450 on Amazon

Search RTX A400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.