
Mobility Radeon X2300 vs Quadro FX 350M

Mobility Radeon X2300
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X2300 is positioned at rank 694 and the Quadro FX 350M is on rank 228, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2300
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X2300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon X2300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X2300 and Quadro FX 350M

Mobility Radeon X2300
The Mobility Radeon X2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points.

Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X2300 scores 48 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Mobility Radeon X2300 leads by 6.7%. The Mobility Radeon X2300 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 48+7% | 45 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X2300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: AVIVO vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | None |
| Decoder | AVIVO | PureVideo HD (VP1) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2300 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+400% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X2300 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Broadway | GT200B |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #846 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















