MOBILITY RADEON X300 vs GeForce FX 5900ZT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is positioned at rank #716 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X300

#706

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

15966%

#708

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

14474%

#709

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

14435%

#713

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

13126%

#714

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

13037%

#716

MOBILITY RADEON X300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#717

MOBILITY RADEON X700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

99%

#718

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

97%

#719

RADEON X800 SE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

96%

#720

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

81%

#721

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

75%

#722

GeForce 7800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

66%

#723

RADEON 9600SE

MSRP: $65|Avg: $65

62%

#724

Radeon X1200

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

60%

#725

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

59%

#726

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

56%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

54%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

53%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

50%

#730

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

49%

#731

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

49%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900ZT.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON X300	GeForce FX 5900ZT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON X300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON X300 Benchmark Check

GeForce FX 5900ZT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X300 and GeForce FX 5900ZT

MOBILITY RADEON X300

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

GeForce FX 5900ZT

The GeForce FX 5900ZT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 scores 34 and the GeForce FX 5900ZT reaches 33 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce FX 5900ZT uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X300	GeForce FX 5900ZT
G3D Mark Score	34+3%	33
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Rankine
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	1024 ×2+28%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS ×2+11%
ROPs	16	48 ×2+200%
TMUs	40	64 ×2+60%
L1 Cache	0.08 MB	1 MB+1150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X300	GeForce FX 5900ZT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900ZT) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X300	GeForce FX 5900ZT
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900ZT). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X300	GeForce FX 5900ZT
DirectX	9.0b	9.0a
OpenGL	2.0	2.1+5%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX 5900ZT's 365W — a 151.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X300	GeForce FX 5900ZT
TDP	50W-86%	365W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	—	218mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	70-7%
Perf/Watt	0.7+600%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce FX 5900ZT launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5900ZT costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5900ZT) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5900ZT is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).