Opteron 254
VS
Celeron E1400

Opteron 254 vs Celeron E1400

AMD

Opteron 254

1 Cores1 Thrd92 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Celeron E1400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 254 is positioned at rank 658 and the Celeron E1400 is on rank 930, so the Opteron 254 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 254

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12048%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2275%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2021%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1561%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
98%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#658
Opteron 254
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23107%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21834%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15853%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4776%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3783%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3309%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1895%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1871%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1703%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1703%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1684%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1639%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1616%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1609%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1595%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
100%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
99%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
100%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
99%
#935
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#936
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
99%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
98%
#938
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#939
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
97%
#940
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
97%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
97%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
97%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 254 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron E1400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 254Celeron E1400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Troy (2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 254Celeron E1400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 254 and Celeron E1400

AMD

Opteron 254

The Opteron 254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Troy (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 92 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron E1400

The Celeron E1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $57.

Processing Power

The Opteron 254 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron E1400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron E1400 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Opteron 254 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron E1400 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 254. The Opteron 254 uses the Troy (2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron E1400 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 254 scores 690 against the Celeron E1400's 715 — a 3.6% lead for the Celeron E1400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 254Celeron E1400
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+40%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (total)
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Troy (2005)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
690
715+4%
Geekbench 6 Single
260
Geekbench 6 Multi
470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 254 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E1400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 254Celeron E1400
Socket
940
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 254) / No (Celeron E1400). Primary use case: Celeron E1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1400 rivals Pentium E2180.

FeatureOpteron 254Celeron E1400
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget