Opteron 3280 vs Pentium G4620

Opteron 3280 vs Pentium G4620 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 3280

8 / 8

3,783

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G4620

2 / 4

3,761

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 3280 vs Pentium G4620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 3280 vs Pentium G4620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 3280

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌27.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 51W.

Pentium G4620

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 65W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3280 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,761 vs 3,783).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3280, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Opteron 3280 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3280 better than Pentium G4620?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3280 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium G4620 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3280 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3280 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3280 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 3280 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4620 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (43.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 3280 vs Pentium G4620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 3280

The Opteron 3280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,783 points. Launch price was $229.

Pentium G4620

The Pentium G4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,761 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 3280 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G4620 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3280 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 3280 versus 3.7 GHz on the Pentium G4620 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Pentium G4620 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Opteron 3280 uses the Zurich (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4620 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3280 scores 3,783 against the Pentium G4620's 3,761 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 3280. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3280 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4620.

Feature	Opteron 3280	Pentium G4620
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+300%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+167%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Zurich (2012)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,783	3,761

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3280 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4620 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.