Opteron 3280
VS
Xeon E5-1607

Opteron 3280 vs Xeon E5-1607

AMD

Opteron 3280

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1607

4 Cores4 Thrd130 WW2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3280 is positioned at rank 93 and the Xeon E5-1607 is on rank 638, so the Opteron 3280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3280

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2197%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
415%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
369%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
285%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
92%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
89%
#93
Opteron 3280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10973%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1841%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1422%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
99%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
96%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
96%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
95%
#638
Xeon E5-1607
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#640
Xeon W-2104
MSRP: $294|Avg: $309
99%
#643
Xeon E5-2620 v3
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
98%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
95%
#652
Xeon E5-1650 v3
MSRP: $583|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1607 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightOpteron 3280Xeon E5-1607
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3280 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightOpteron 3280Xeon E5-1607
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3280 and Xeon E5-1607

AMD

Opteron 3280

The Opteron 3280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,783 points. Launch price was $229.

Intel

Xeon E5-1607

The Xeon E5-1607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 3,788 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3280 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3280 has 4 more cores. The Opteron 3280 is built on the Zurich (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Opteron 3280 scores 3,783 against the Xeon E5-1607's 3,788 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1607. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3280 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607.

FeatureOpteron 3280Xeon E5-1607
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10 MB+25%
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Zurich (2012)
PassMark
3,783
3,788
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3280 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3280Xeon E5-1607
Socket
AM3+
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0