Opteron 4334
VS
Celeron N5105

Opteron 4334 vs Celeron N5105

AMD

Opteron 4334

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron N5105

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 4334 is positioned at rank #90 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 4334

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2105%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
397%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
353%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
273%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
88%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
85%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N5105 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 4334Celeron N5105
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($130)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Seoul (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 4334 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 4334Celeron N5105
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($130)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 4334 and Celeron N5105

AMD

Opteron 4334

The Opteron 4334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,949 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Opteron 4334 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Celeron N5105 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 4334 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 4334 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 — a 18.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 4334 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 4334 uses the Seoul (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N5105 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 4334 scores 3,949 against the Celeron N5105's 4,003 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4334 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105.

FeatureOpteron 4334Celeron N5105
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+21%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+55%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6144 kB+300%
1.5 MB (total)
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Seoul (2012)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
3,949
4,003+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 4334 uses the C32 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N5105 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 4334Celeron N5105
Socket
C32
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%