
Opteron 6278 vs Xeon E-2374G

Opteron 6278

Xeon E-2374G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6278
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2374G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 6278 | Xeon E-2374G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-E (2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 6278 | Xeon E-2374G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6278 and Xeon E-2374G

Opteron 6278
The Opteron 6278 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,733 points. Launch price was $988.

Xeon E-2374G
The Xeon E-2374G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,726 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Opteron 6278 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2374G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6278 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6278 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2374G — a 41% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2374G (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Opteron 6278 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E-2374G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6278 scores 13,733 against the Xeon E-2374G's 13,726 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 6278. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 6278 | Xeon E-2374G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+300% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5 GHz+52% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 13,733 | 13,726 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 6278 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E-2374G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 6278 | Xeon E-2374G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G34 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













