
Opteron 6281

Xeon E5-1620 v4
Opteron 6281 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 6281 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 6281 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 6281
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $178 less on MSRP ($988 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($988 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 140W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,279 vs 7,338).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
Xeon E5-1620 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $988 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-1620 v4 better than Opteron 6281?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 6281 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6281
The Opteron 6281 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $988.

Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,338 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
The Opteron 6281 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6281 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6281 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v4 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 v4 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Opteron 6281 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6281 scores 7,279 against the Xeon E5-1620 v4's 7,338 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-1620 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6281 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v4.
| Feature | Opteron 6281 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+300% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 7,279 | 7,338 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 6281 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 6281 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G34 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Opteron 6281 was priced at $988, while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 came in at $1166. On launch pricing ($988 vs $1166), Opteron 6281 was $178 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6281 delivers 7.4 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v4 — making the Opteron 6281 the 15.7% better value option.
| Feature | Opteron 6281 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $988-15% | $1166 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4+17% | 6.3 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















