Opteron X2170 vs Xeon E5507

Opteron X2170 vs Xeon E5507 Performance Spectrum

Opteron X2170

4 / 4

1,911

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5507

4 / 4

1,905

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron X2170 vs Xeon E5507 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron X2170 vs Xeon E5507: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron X2170

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 25W instead of 80W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5507

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron X2170 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 1,911).
❌220% higher power demand at 80W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X2170 better than Xeon E5507?

Yes. Opteron X2170 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron X2170 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron X2170 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X2170 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron X2170 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X2170 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron X2170 vs Xeon E5507 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron X2170

The Opteron X2170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Steppe Eagle (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,911 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5507

The Xeon E5507 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $457.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5507 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Opteron X2170 versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5507 — a 159.6% clock advantage for the Opteron X2170 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Opteron X2170 uses the Steppe Eagle (2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5507 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X2170 scores 1,911 against the Xeon E5507's 1,905 — a 0.3% lead for the Opteron X2170. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron X2170 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5507.

Feature	Opteron X2170	Xeon E5507
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+789%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+6%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Steppe Eagle (2016)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,911	1,905

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron X2170 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5507 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.