Opteron X3216
Pentium 987
Opteron X3216 vs Pentium 987 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron X3216 vs Pentium 987 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
Deadlock
Delta Force
Destiny 2
Opteron X3216 vs Pentium 987: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron X3216
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium 987
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,487 vs 1,498).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Opteron X3216 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron X3216 better than Pentium 987?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron X3216 vs Pentium 987 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Opteron X3216
The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.
Pentium 987
The Pentium 987 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,487 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron X3216 and Pentium 987 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium 987 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Opteron X3216 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium 987 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3216 scores 1,498 against the Pentium 987's 1,487 — a 0.7% lead for the Opteron X3216.
| Feature | Opteron X3216 | Pentium 987 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+100% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz+7% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Excavator (2017−2018) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,498 | 1,487 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron X3216 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 987 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron X3216 | Pentium 987 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron X3216 and Pentium 987
