Opteron X3216
VS
Pentium 987

Opteron X3216 vs Pentium 987

AMD

Opteron X3216

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium 987

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron X3216 is positioned at rank 395 and the Pentium 987 is on rank 1052, so the Opteron X3216 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3216

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5549%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1048%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
931%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
719%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
99%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
99%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
98%
#395
Opteron X3216
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
99%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 987

#1040
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2643%
#1041
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2605%
#1042
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2391%
#1043
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2380%
#1044
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2358%
#1046
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2277%
#1047
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2184%
#1048
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2180%
#1049
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2122%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
100%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
100%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
99%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
98%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
97%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
97%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
96%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
96%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
95%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
94%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3216 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron X3216Pentium 987
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium 987 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron X3216Pentium 987
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron X3216 and Pentium 987

AMD

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Pentium 987

The Pentium 987 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,487 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron X3216 and Pentium 987 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium 987 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Opteron X3216 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium 987 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3216 scores 1,498 against the Pentium 987's 1,487 — a 0.7% lead for the Opteron X3216.

FeatureOpteron X3216Pentium 987
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+100%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz+7%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Excavator (2017−2018)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,498
1,487
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron X3216 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 987 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron X3216Pentium 987
Socket
FP4
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0