Celeron 1017U
VS
Opteron X3216

Celeron 1017U vs Opteron X3216

Intel

Celeron 1017U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Opteron X3216

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1017U is positioned at rank 975 and the Opteron X3216 is on rank 395, so the Opteron X3216 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1017U

#963
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1946%
#964
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1917%
#965
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1760%
#966
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1752%
#967
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1736%
#969
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1676%
#970
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1607%
#971
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1605%
#972
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1562%
#975
Celeron 1017U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
100%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3216

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5549%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1048%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
931%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
719%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
99%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
99%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
98%
#395
Opteron X3216
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
99%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3216 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 1017UOpteron X3216
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 1017U (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 1017UOpteron X3216
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1017U and Opteron X3216

Intel

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1017U and Opteron X3216 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 — a 60.9% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 1017U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X3216 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the Opteron X3216's 1,498 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 1017U.

FeatureCeleron 1017UOpteron X3216
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3 GHz+87%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (total)+100%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark
1,508
1,498
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1017U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X3216 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1017UOpteron X3216
Socket
BGA1023
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

The Celeron 1017U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Opteron X3216 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1017UOpteron X3216
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)