Celeron 1017U vs Phenom X4 9750B

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom X4 9750B Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1017U

2 / 2

1,508

0.0%

1,520

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom X4 9750B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom X4 9750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1017U

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Phenom X4 9750B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,508 vs 1,520).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Phenom X4 9750B

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $215 MSRP, while Celeron 1017U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1017U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom X4 9750B better than Celeron 1017U?

Yes. Phenom X4 9750B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom X4 9750B has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 50% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9750B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom X4 9750B is the better buy right now. Phenom X4 9750B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $215 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1017U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom X4 9750B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom X4 9750B

The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1017U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B — a 40% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B. The Celeron 1017U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 — a 0.8% lead for the Phenom X4 9750B. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B.

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Phenom X4 9750B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,508	1,520
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1017U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1017U versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B — the Celeron 1017U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1017U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1017U) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Phenom X4 9750B
Socket	BGA1023	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1017U) / AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). The Celeron 1017U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Phenom X4 9750B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop.