Celeron 1017U vs Pentium 2129Y

Intel

Celeron 1017U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 2129Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 1017U vs Pentium 2129Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1017U vs Pentium 2129Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1017U vs Pentium 2129Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1017U

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium 2129Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 2129Y

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,502 vs 1,508).
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1017U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 1017U better than Pentium 2129Y?
    Yes. Celeron 1017U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1017U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1017U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 1017U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 1017U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 1017U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron 1017U vs Pentium 2129Y Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 1017U

    The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium 2129Y

    The Pentium 2129Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $150.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron 1017U and Pentium 2129Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 1.1 GHz on the Pentium 2129Y — a 37% clock advantage for the Celeron 1017U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the Pentium 2129Y's 1,502 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 1017U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 2129Y.

    FeatureCeleron 1017UPentium 2129Y
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz+45%
    1.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz+45%
    1.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    2 MB
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256K (per core)
    Process
    22 nm
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    PassMark
    1,508
    1,502
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the BGA1023 socket with PCIe 3.0.

    FeatureCeleron 1017UPentium 2129Y
    Socket
    BGA1023
    BGA1023
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    The Celeron 1017U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium 2129Y requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureCeleron 1017UPentium 2129Y
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)