Celeron 1017U vs Core i5-4210Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1017U vs Core i5-4210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1017U vs Core i5-4210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1017U

2013

Why buy it

✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,508 vs 1,530).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i5-4210Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4210Y better than Celeron 1017U?

Yes. Core i5-4210Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4210Y has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 18.7% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4210Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4210Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1017U vs Core i5-4210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4210Y

The Core i5-4210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1017U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4210Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4210Y — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4210Y (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron 1017U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4210Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the Core i5-4210Y's 1,530 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-4210Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210Y.

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Core i5-4210Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+7%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,508	1,530+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	580

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1017U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4210Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1017U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1017U) vs 12 (Core i5-4210Y) — the Celeron 1017U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1017U) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210Y).

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Core i5-4210Y
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1017U) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1017U) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210Y rivals A4-6210.

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Core i5-4210Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	—	Tablet/2-in-1