Celeron 1017U vs Phenom II X3 705e

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1017U

2 / 2

1,508

0.0%

1,519

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom II X3 705e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom II X3 705e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1017U

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Phenom II X3 705e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,508 vs 1,519).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Phenom II X3 705e

2009

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1017U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X3 705e better than Celeron 1017U?

Yes. Phenom II X3 705e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X3 705e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X3 705e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X3 705e still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X3 705e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1017U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1017U vs Phenom II X3 705e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X3 705e

The Phenom II X3 705e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,519 points. Launch price was $152.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1017U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 705e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 705e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 2.5 GHz on the Phenom II X3 705e — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 705e (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 1017U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X3 705e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the Phenom II X3 705e's 1,519 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X3 705e. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 705e.

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Phenom II X3 705e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.5 GHz+56%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,508	1,519

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1017U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 705e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.