Core i3-380UM
VS
Opteron X3216

Core i3-380UM vs Opteron X3216

Intel

Core i3-380UM

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Opteron X3216

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-380UM is positioned at rank 225 and the Opteron X3216 is on rank 395, so the Core i3-380UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380UM

#213
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#214
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#215
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
353%
#216
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#217
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#219
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#220
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#221
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
322%
#222
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#225
Core i3-380UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3216

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5549%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1048%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
931%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
719%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
99%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
99%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
98%
#395
Opteron X3216
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
99%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3216 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-380UMOpteron X3216
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-380UM (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-380UMOpteron X3216
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-380UM and Opteron X3216

Intel

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Opteron X3216's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 — a 196% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron X3216 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Opteron X3216's 1,498 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-380UM.

FeatureCore i3-380UMOpteron X3216
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.03 GHz
3 GHz+9900%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
1.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (total)+100%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark
1,502
1,498
Geekbench 6 Single
199
Geekbench 6 Multi
451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron X3216 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-380UMOpteron X3216
Socket
BGA1288
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Core i3-380UM) / not specified (Opteron X3216). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Opteron X3216 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureCore i3-380UMOpteron X3216
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget