Core i3-380UM vs Opteron X3216

Core i3-380UM vs Opteron X3216 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-380UM

2 / 4

1,502

+0.3%

Pentium U5600

Celeron 1019Y

Core i3-370M

Pentium Dual Core T4500

1,498

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-380UM vs Opteron X3216 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-380UM vs Opteron X3216: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-380UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Opteron X3216 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Opteron X3216

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,498 vs 1,502).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X3216 better than Core i3-380UM?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X3216 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-380UM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-380UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X3216 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron X3216 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3216 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-380UM vs Opteron X3216 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Opteron X3216's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 — a 196% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron X3216 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Opteron X3216's 1,498 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-380UM.

Feature	Core i3-380UM	Opteron X3216
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.03 GHz	3 GHz+9900%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	1.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark	1,502	1,498
Geekbench 6 Single	199	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	451	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron X3216 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-380UM	Opteron X3216
Socket	BGA1288	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Core i3-380UM) / not specified (Opteron X3216). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Opteron X3216 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.