Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X3 705e

Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance Spectrum

Core i3-380UM

2 / 4

1,502

0.0%

Pentium U5600

Celeron 1019Y

Core i3-370M

Pentium Dual Core T4500

1,519

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X3 705e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X3 705e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-380UM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Phenom II X3 705e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,502 vs 1,519).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Phenom II X3 705e

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X3 705e better than Core i3-380UM?

Yes. Phenom II X3 705e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X3 705e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X3 705e is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X3 705e still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X3 705e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-380UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X3 705e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X3 705e

The Phenom II X3 705e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,519 points. Launch price was $152.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X3 705e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 705e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 2.5 GHz on the Phenom II X3 705e — a 195.3% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 705e (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X3 705e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Phenom II X3 705e's 1,519 — a 1.1% lead for the Phenom II X3 705e. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 705e.

Feature	Core i3-380UM	Phenom II X3 705e
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	0.03 GHz	2.5 GHz+8233%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	2.5 GHz+88%
L3 Cache	3 MB	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,502	1,519+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	199	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	451	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X3 705e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-380UM	Phenom II X3 705e
Socket	BGA1288	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Core i3-380UM) / not specified (Phenom II X3 705e). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X3 705e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.