CPU
GPU
Core i3-380UM
Phenom X4 9750B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-380UM is positioned at rank 225 and the Phenom X4 9750B is on rank 1047, so the Core i3-380UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380UM
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9750B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($34) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($34) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-380UM and Phenom X4 9750B
Core i3-380UM
The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.
Phenom X4 9750B
The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B — a 195.1% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B. The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 — a 1.2% lead for the Phenom X4 9750B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 199 vs 300, a 40.5% lead for the Phenom X4 9750B that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 451 vs 1,000 (75.7% advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 0.03 GHz | 2.4 GHz+7900% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,502 | 1,520+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 199 | 300+51% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 451 | 1,000+122% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Core i3-380UM versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B — the Core i3-380UM supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i3-380UM) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800+50% | DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Core i3-380UM) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom X4 9750B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget, Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-380UM and Phenom X4 9750B
