
Core i3-380UM

Phenom X4 9750B
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom X4 9750B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom X4 9750B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom X4 9750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-380UM
2010Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Phenom X4 9750B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (199 vs 300).
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (451 vs 1,000).
- β438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Phenom X4 9750B
2008Why buy it
- β +50.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $215 MSRP, while Core i3-380UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom X4 9750B better than Core i3-380UM?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom X4 9750B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-380UM
The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom X4 9750B
The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007β2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B β a 195.1% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B. The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010β2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007β2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 β a 1.2% lead for the Phenom X4 9750B. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 199 vs 300, a 40.5% lead for the Phenom X4 9750B that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 451 vs 1,000 (75.7% advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 0.03 GHz | 2.4 GHz+7900% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010β2011) | Agena (2007β2008) |
| PassMark | 1,502 | 1,520+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 199 | 300+51% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 451 | 1,000+122% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Core i3-380UM versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B β the Phenom X4 9750B supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i3-380UM) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR2-1066+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Core i3-380UM) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom X4 9750B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget, Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















