
Core i3-380UM

Phenom II X2 N640
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X2 N640 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X2 N640 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X2 N640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-380UM
2010Why buy it
- ✅+6.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Phenom II X2 N640 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (199 vs 300).
- ❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
Phenom II X2 N640
2010Why buy it
- ✅+50.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (422 vs 451).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i3-380UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X2 N640 better than Core i3-380UM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-380UM vs Phenom II X2 N640 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-380UM
The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X2 N640
The Phenom II X2 N640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,505 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Phenom II X2 N640's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 2.9 GHz on the Phenom II X2 N640 — a 195.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 N640. The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X2 N640 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Phenom II X2 N640's 1,505 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X2 N640. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 199 vs 300, a 40.5% lead for the Phenom II X2 N640 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 451 vs 422 (6.6% advantage for the Core i3-380UM).
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom II X2 N640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.03 GHz | 2.9 GHz+9567% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,502 | 1,505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 199 | 300+51% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 451+7% | 422 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X2 N640 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Core i3-380UM versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X2 N640 — the Phenom II X2 N640 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i3-380UM) and RS880M (Phenom II X2 N640).
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom II X2 N640 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR3-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Core i3-380UM) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X2 N640). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X2 N640 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget, Phenom II X2 N640 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Phenom II X2 N640 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















