Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core i3-380UM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core i3-380UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core i3-380UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (188 vs 199).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (338 vs 451).
❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while Core i3-380UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-380UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+5.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-380UM better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?

Yes. Core i3-380UM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 33.4% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-380UM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-380UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 33.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-380UM is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-380UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo SU7300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-380UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core i3-380UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-380UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM — a 191% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SU7300 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-380UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Core i3-380UM's 1,502 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-380UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 188 vs 199, a 5.7% lead for the Core i3-380UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 338 vs 451 (28.6% advantage for the Core i3-380UM). L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Core i3-380UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz+4233%	0.03 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	1.33 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache	3 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,496	1,502
Geekbench 6 Single	188	199+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi	338	451+33%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-380UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus DDR3-800 on the Core i3-380UM — the Core 2 Duo SU7300 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs 16 (Core i3-380UM) — the Core i3-380UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i3-380UM).

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Core i3-380UM
Socket	BGA956	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs No (Core i3-380UM). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop, Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.