Celeron 1017U vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1017U vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1017U vs Core 2 Duo SU7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1017U

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,496 vs 1,508).
❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while Celeron 1017U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1017U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1017U better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?

Yes. Celeron 1017U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1017U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1017U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1017U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron 1017U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo SU7300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1017U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1017U vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1017U and Core 2 Duo SU7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 1017U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 1017U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the Core 2 Duo SU7300's 1,496 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 1017U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300.

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	3 MB+500%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,508	1,496
Geekbench 6 Single	—	188
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1017U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1017U versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — the Celeron 1017U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1017U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1017U) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) — the Celeron 1017U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1017U) and GS45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo SU7300).

Feature	Celeron 1017U	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Socket	BGA1023	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1017U) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300). The Celeron 1017U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.