Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G850

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G850

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G850 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Pentium G850

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $203 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
  • Delivers 234.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,491 vs 1,496).
  • 2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G850 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G850 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G850 is the better buy right now. Pentium G850 comes in $203 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo SU7300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 234.9% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Pentium G850

The Pentium G850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,491 points. Launch price was $27.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium G850 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G850 — a 76.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G850 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G850 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Pentium G850's 1,491 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G850.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G850
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.9 GHz+123%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
2.9 GHz+123%
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,496
1,491
Geekbench 6 Single
188
Geekbench 6 Multi
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G850 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G850
Socket
BGA956
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300) / not specified (Pentium G850). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G850
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 was priced at $289, while the Pentium G850 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($289 vs $86), Pentium G850 was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SU7300 delivers 5.2 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G850 — making the Pentium G850 the 108% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G850
MSRP
$289
$86-70%
Performance per Dollar
5.2
17.3+233%
Release Date
2009
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.