C-70 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

C-70 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Performance Spectrum

C-70

2 / 2

1,495

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 / 2

1,496

+0.1%

Pentium U5600

Core i5-540UM

Pentium Extreme Edition 965

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-70 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-70 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-70

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7290, while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,495 vs 1,496).
❌200% higher power demand at 9W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 9W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while C-70 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while C-70 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo SU7300 better than C-70?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, C-70 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo SU7300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $289 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that C-70 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

C-70 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-70

The C-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,495 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-70 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-70 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the C-70 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The C-70 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the C-70 scores 1,495 against the Core 2 Duo SU7300's 1,496 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-70 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300.

Feature	C-70	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz+2%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+16967%	3 MB
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,495	1,496
Geekbench 6 Single	—	188
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-70 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-70) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo SU7300). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-70) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) — the C-70 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-70) and GS45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo SU7300).

Feature	C-70	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Socket	FT1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-70) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300). The C-70 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7290), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.