C-70 vs Core Duo T2400

C-70 vs Core Duo T2400 Performance Spectrum

C-70

2 / 2

1,495

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2400

2 / 2

1,488

0.0%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-70 vs Core Duo T2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-70 vs Core Duo T2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-70

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7290, while Core Duo T2400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌350% higher power demand at 9W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 9W, a 7W reduction.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,488 vs 1,495).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while C-70 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while C-70 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Duo T2400 better than C-70?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Duo T2400 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, C-70 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, C-70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Duo T2400 is the better buy right now. Core Duo T2400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that C-70 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-70 vs Core Duo T2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-70

The C-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,495 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Duo T2400

The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-70 and Core Duo T2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-70 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2400 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The C-70 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core Duo T2400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the C-70 scores 1,495 against the Core Duo T2400's 1,488 — a 0.5% lead for the C-70. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	C-70	Core Duo T2400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	1.83 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.83 GHz+83%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	40 nm-38%	65 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,495	1,488

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-70 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-70 versus DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 — the C-70 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (C-70) vs 2 (Core Duo T2400). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-70) vs 16 (Core Duo T2400) — the Core Duo T2400 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-70) and 945GM,945PM (Core Duo T2400).

Feature	C-70	Core Duo T2400
Socket	FT1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+60%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-70) / VT-x (Core Duo T2400). The C-70 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7290), while the Core Duo T2400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310.