C-70 vs Celeron 1017U

C-70 vs Celeron 1017U Performance Spectrum

C-70

2 / 2

1,495

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1017U

2 / 2

1,508

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-70 vs Celeron 1017U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-70 vs Celeron 1017U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-70

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,495 vs 1,508).

Celeron 1017U

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1017U better than C-70?

Yes. Celeron 1017U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1017U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1017U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1017U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 1017U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1017U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-70 vs Celeron 1017U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-70

The C-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,495 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-70 and Celeron 1017U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-70 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U — a 18.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 1017U (base: 1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The C-70 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron 1017U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the C-70 scores 1,495 against the Celeron 1017U's 1,508 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 1017U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-70 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U.

Feature	C-70	Celeron 1017U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	1.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.6 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	40 nm	22 nm-45%
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,495	1,508

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-70 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1017U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-70 versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1017U — the Celeron 1017U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1017U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-70) vs 2 (Celeron 1017U). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-70) vs 16 (Celeron 1017U) — the Celeron 1017U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-70) and Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1017U).

Feature	C-70	Celeron 1017U
Socket	FT1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7290 (C-70) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1017U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.