C-70 vs Core i3-380UM

C-70 vs Core i3-380UM Performance Spectrum

C-70

2 / 2

1,495

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-380UM

2 / 4

1,502

+0.5%

Pentium U5600

Celeron 1019Y

Core i3-370M

Pentium Dual Core T4500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-70 vs Core i3-380UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-70 vs Core i3-380UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-70

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,495 vs 1,502).

Core i3-380UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is C-70 better than Core i3-380UM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, C-70 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-380UM pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-380UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

C-70 still makes the most sense overall. C-70 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

C-70 vs Core i3-380UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-70

The C-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,495 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The C-70 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-380UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-70 versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM — a 191.2% clock advantage for the C-70 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The C-70 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core i3-380UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the C-70 scores 1,495 against the Core i3-380UM's 1,502 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-380UM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-70 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM.

Feature	C-70	Core i3-380UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz+4333%	0.03 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.33 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	40 nm	32 nm-20%
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,495	1,502
Geekbench 6 Single	—	199
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	451

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-70 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-380UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-70 versus DDR3-800 on the Core i3-380UM — the C-70 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-380UM supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-70) vs 2 (Core i3-380UM). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-70) vs 16 (Core i3-380UM) — the Core i3-380UM offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-70) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i3-380UM).

Feature	C-70	Core i3-380UM
Socket	FT1	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-70) / No (Core i3-380UM). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7290 (C-70) and Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-380UM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.