Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 / 2

1,496

0.0%

Pentium U5600

Core i5-540UM

Pentium Extreme Edition 965

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

2 / 2

1,503

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,496 vs 1,503).
❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 3W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 3W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?

Yes. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo SU7300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo SU7300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,503 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80's 1,503 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.1 GHz+62%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,496	1,503
Geekbench 6 Single	188	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	338	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Socket	BGA956	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.