Core 2 Duo SU7300
VS
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is positioned at rank 43 and the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is on rank 444, so the Core 2 Duo SU7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SU7300

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#31
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
196%
#32
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
193%
#33
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
177%
#34
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
177%
#35
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
175%
#37
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
169%
#38
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
162%
#39
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
162%
#40
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
157%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

#432
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
586%
#433
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
577%
#434
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
530%
#435
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
527%
#436
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
523%
#438
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
505%
#439
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
484%
#440
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
483%
#441
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
470%
#444
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo SU7300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo SU7300Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo SU7300Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,503 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80's 1,503 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz+62%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,496
1,503
Geekbench 6 Single
188
Geekbench 6 Multi
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Socket
BGA956
S1g2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop