Core i3-380UM vs Xeon X5270

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-380UM vs Xeon X5270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-380UM vs Xeon X5270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-380UM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Xeon X5270 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5270 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,502 vs 1,524).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon X5270

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5270 better than Core i3-380UM?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5270 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-380UM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5270 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5270 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5270 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5270 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-380UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-380UM vs Xeon X5270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5270

The Xeon X5270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,524 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-380UM is built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Xeon X5270's 1,524 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon X5270. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5270.

Feature	Core i3-380UM	Xeon X5270
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	0.03 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	3.5 GHz+163%
L3 Cache	3 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,502	1,524+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	199	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	451	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5270 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-380UM	Xeon X5270
Socket	BGA1288	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Core i3-380UM) / not specified (Xeon X5270). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Xeon X5270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.