CPU
GPU
Core i3-380UM
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-380UM is positioned at rank 225 and the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is on rank 444, so the Core i3-380UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380UM
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-380UM | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-380UM | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-380UM and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Core i3-380UM
The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,503 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 — a 194.4% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80's 1,503 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.03 GHz | 2.1 GHz+6900% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Puma (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,502 | 1,503 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 199 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 451 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | S1g2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Core i3-380UM) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-380UM and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
