Pentium 1403 vs Pentium M 765

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 1403 vs Pentium M 765 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 1403 vs Pentium M 765: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 1403

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌281% higher power demand at 80W vs 21W.

Pentium M 765

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 80W, a 59W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,834 vs 1,851).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 1403 better than Pentium M 765?

Yes. Pentium 1403 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 1403 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 1403 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 1403 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium 1403 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 1403 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium 1403 vs Pentium M 765 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 1403

The Pentium 1403 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 5 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,851 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 765

The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 1403 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 765 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium 1403 has 1 more core. The Pentium M 765 is built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium 1403 scores 1,851 against the Pentium M 765's 1,834 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium 1403. L3 cache: 5 MB on the Pentium 1403 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 765.

Feature	Pentium 1403	Pentium M 765
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+24%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	5 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,851	1,834