Pentium 1403 vs Turion II M500

Pentium 1403 vs Turion II M500 Performance Spectrum

Pentium 1403

2 / 2

1,851

0.0%

1,865

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 1403 vs Turion II M500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 1403 vs Turion II M500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 1403

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II M500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,851 vs 1,865).
❌7900% higher power demand at 80W vs 1W.

Turion II M500

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 80W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II M500 better than Pentium 1403?

Yes. Turion II M500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II M500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II M500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II M500 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II M500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 1403 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium 1403 vs Turion II M500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 1403

The Pentium 1403 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 5 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,851 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion II M500

The Turion II M500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 1403 and Turion II M500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Turion II M500 is built on the Caspian (2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium 1403 scores 1,851 against the Turion II M500's 1,865 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion II M500.

Feature	Pentium 1403	Turion II M500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	5 MB	—
L2 Cache	—	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	—	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	1,851	1,865