Pentium 2030M
VS
Pentium D 820

Pentium 2030M vs Pentium D 820

Intel

Pentium 2030M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium D 820

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 2030M is positioned at rank 27 and the Pentium D 820 is on rank 1065, so the Pentium 2030M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 2030M

#15
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
168%
#16
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#17
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
152%
#18
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
151%
#19
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
150%
#21
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#22
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#23
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#24
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
135%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
100%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
98%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
97%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
95%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
53194%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
50263%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
36495%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10994%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8709%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7618%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4363%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4306%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3921%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3921%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3877%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3772%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3720%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3705%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3671%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
100%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
99%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
98%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
96%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
96%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
92%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
85%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
84%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
81%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
79%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
73%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
69%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
68%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
67%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium 2030M (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium 2030MPentium D 820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium D 820 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium 2030MPentium D 820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+578%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 2030M and Pentium D 820

Intel

Pentium 2030M

The Pentium 2030M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Pentium D 820

The Pentium D 820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 2030M and Pentium D 820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Pentium 2030M versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 820 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Pentium D 820 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium 2030M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium D 820 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 2030M scores 1,396 against the Pentium D 820's 1,412 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium D 820. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 2030M vs 0 kB on the Pentium D 820.

FeaturePentium 2030MPentium D 820
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-76%
90 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,396
1,412+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
166
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 2030M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium D 820 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 2030MPentium D 820
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 2030M) / No (Pentium D 820).

FeaturePentium 2030MPentium D 820
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium 2030M launched at $134 MSRP, while the Pentium D 820 debuted at $241.

FeaturePentium 2030MPentium D 820
MSRP
$134-44%
$241
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Release Date
2013
2005