Pentium 2030M vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100

Intel

Pentium 2030M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Pentium 2030M vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 2030M vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 2030M vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 2030M

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 1,409).
    • 25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

    Pentium Dual Core SU4100

    2009

    Why buy it

    • +0.9% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium Dual Core SU4100 better than Pentium 2030M?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 2030M is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual Core SU4100 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $134 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium 2030M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.9% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium 2030M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium 2030M vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium 2030M

    The Pentium 2030M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $134.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual Core SU4100

    The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium 2030M and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Pentium 2030M versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — a 63.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 2030M. The Pentium 2030M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 2030M scores 1,396 against the Pentium Dual Core SU4100's 1,409 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100.

    FeaturePentium 2030MPentium Dual Core SU4100
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.5 GHz+92%
    1.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)+12700%
    2 MB
    Process
    22 nm-51%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    1,396
    1,409
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium 2030M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium 2030MPentium Dual Core SU4100
    Socket
    PGA988
    BGA956
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+173%
    PCIe 1.1
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Pentium 2030M was priced at $134, while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($134 vs $134), Pentium Dual Core SU4100 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 2030M delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — making the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 the 0.9% better value option.

    FeaturePentium 2030MPentium Dual Core SU4100
    MSRP
    $134
    $134
    Performance per Dollar
    10.4
    10.5
    Release Date
    2013
    2009

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.