Pentium 3560Y
VS
Celeron N2940

Pentium 3560Y vs Celeron N2940

Intel

Pentium 3560Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron N2940

4 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.25 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3560Y is positioned at rank 1160 and the Celeron N2940 is on rank 1085, so the Celeron N2940 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3560Y

#1147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4174%
#1148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4112%
#1149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3775%
#1150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3758%
#1151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3724%
#1153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3596%
#1154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3448%
#1155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3442%
#1156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3350%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1160
Pentium 3560Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
96%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1172
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1173
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2940

#1073
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2979%
#1074
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2935%
#1075
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2694%
#1076
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2682%
#1077
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2658%
#1079
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2566%
#1080
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2461%
#1081
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2457%
#1082
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2391%
#1085
Celeron N2940
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
98%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
96%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
95%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2940 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 3560Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 3560YCeleron N2940
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium 3560YCeleron N2940
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N2940

Intel

Pentium 3560Y

The Pentium 3560Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2940

The Celeron N2940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,054 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium 3560Y packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N2940 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2940 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 3560Y versus 2.25 GHz on the Celeron N2940 — a 60.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N2940 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Pentium 3560Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2940 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3560Y scores 1,055 against the Celeron N2940's 1,054 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 3560Y. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3560Y vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2940.

FeaturePentium 3560YCeleron N2940
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
2.25 GHz+88%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
1.83 GHz+53%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,055
1,054
Geekbench 6 Single
240
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3560Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2940 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3560YCeleron N2940
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 3560Y) / VT-x (Celeron N2940). The Celeron N2940 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium 3560Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2940 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2940 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeaturePentium 3560YCeleron N2940
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Laptop