Pentium 3560Y vs Celeron T1700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3560Y is positioned at rank 1160 and the Celeron T1700 is on rank 1014, so the Celeron T1700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3560Y

#1147

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4174%

#1148

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4112%

#1149

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3775%

#1150

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3758%

#1151

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3724%

#1153

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3596%

#1154

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3448%

#1155

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3442%

#1156

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3350%

#1159

Core M-5Y71

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1160

Pentium 3560Y

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1162

Core i7-2620M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

100%

#1163

Celeron N3010

MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A

98%

#1164

Core i7-3537U

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

97%

#1165

Core M-5Y10c

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1166

Core M-5Y31

MSRP: $281|Avg: $30

96%

#1167

Core M-5Y10a

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1169

Celeron 1047UE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

96%

#1170

Core M-5Y70

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1171

Celeron U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

95%

#1172

Celeron T1600

MSRP: $107|Avg: $15

95%

#1173

Pro A12-8800B

MSRP: $400|Avg: $40

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1700

#1002

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2218%

#1003

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2185%

#1004

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2006%

#1005

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1997%

#1006

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1979%

#1008

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1911%

#1009

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1832%

#1010

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1829%

#1011

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1780%

#1014

Celeron T1700

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

100%

#1015

Celeron T3500

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

100%

#1016

A12-9720P

MSRP: $200|Avg: $25

99%

#1017

Core i5-4300M

MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A

99%

#1018

Celeron 1005M

MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A

98%

#1019

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

98%

#1020

Athlon Neo MV-40

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

96%

#1021

Core i7-4860EQ

MSRP: $434|Avg: $80

96%

#1022

Pentium SU2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

96%

#1023

A4-1250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

95%

#1025

Core i5-4200M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

94%

#1026

Celeron 1000M

MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A

94%

#1028

Celeron B840

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

94%

#1029

Celeron M 743

MSRP: $107|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium 3560Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron T1700 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Pentium 3560Y	Celeron T1700
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Pentium 3560Y	Celeron T1700
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium 3560Y Benchmark Check

Celeron T1700 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3560Y and Celeron T1700

Pentium 3560Y

The Pentium 3560Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 3560Y is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium 3560Y scores 1,055 against the Celeron T1700's 1,058 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T1700. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3560Y vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700.

Feature	Pentium 3560Y	Celeron T1700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.83 GHz+53%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	1,055	1,058

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3560Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron T1700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.