Pentium 3805U
VS
Celeron N2806

Pentium 3805U vs Celeron N2806

Intel

Pentium 3805U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron N2806

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3805U is positioned at rank 344 and the Celeron N2806 is on rank 199, so the Celeron N2806 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3805U

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
98%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
97%
#332
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
491%
#333
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
483%
#334
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
444%
#335
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
442%
#336
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
438%
#338
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
423%
#339
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
405%
#340
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
405%
#341
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
394%
#344
Pentium 3805U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2806

#187
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
368%
#188
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
363%
#189
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
333%
#190
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
332%
#191
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
329%
#193
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
317%
#194
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
304%
#195
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
304%
#196
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
296%
#199
Celeron N2806
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2806 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 3805U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 3805UCeleron N2806
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium 3805UCeleron N2806
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3805U and Celeron N2806

Intel

Pentium 3805U

The Pentium 3805U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 3805U and Celeron N2806 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3805U versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N2806 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium 3805U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N2806 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3805U scores 1,196 against the Celeron N2806's 1,195 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 3805U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3805U vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2806.

FeaturePentium 3805UCeleron N2806
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2 GHz+5%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz+19%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,196
1,195
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3805U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2806 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3805UCeleron N2806
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium 3805U) / not specified (Celeron N2806). The Pentium 3805U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Celeron N2806 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium 3805U targets Mobile.

FeaturePentium 3805UCeleron N2806
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile