Pentium 3805U
VS
Turion 64 ML-28

Pentium 3805U vs Turion 64 ML-28

Intel

Pentium 3805U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3805U is positioned at rank 344 and the Turion 64 ML-28 is on rank 556, so the Pentium 3805U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3805U

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
98%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
97%
#332
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
491%
#333
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
483%
#334
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
444%
#335
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
442%
#336
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
438%
#338
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
423%
#339
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
405%
#340
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
405%
#341
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
394%
#344
Pentium 3805U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-28

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
98%
#544
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
733%
#545
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
722%
#546
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
663%
#547
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
660%
#548
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
654%
#550
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
632%
#551
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
606%
#552
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
605%
#553
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
588%
#556
Turion 64 ML-28
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium 3805U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium 3805UTurion 64 ML-28
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 ML-28 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium 3805UTurion 64 ML-28
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3805U and Turion 64 ML-28

Intel

Pentium 3805U

The Pentium 3805U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $161.

AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium 3805U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium 3805U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3805U versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 3805U. The Pentium 3805U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3805U scores 1,196 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion 64 ML-28. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3805U vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

FeaturePentium 3805UTurion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz+19%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-84%
90 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,196
1,201
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3805U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3805UTurion 64 ML-28
Socket
FCBGA1168
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium 3805U) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-28). The Pentium 3805U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Turion 64 ML-28 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium 3805U targets Mobile.

FeaturePentium 3805UTurion 64 ML-28
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile