Pentium 3805U vs Turion 64 ML-28

Pentium 3805U vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

Pentium 3805U

2 / 2

1,196

0.0%

1,201

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 3805U vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 3805U vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 3805U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Turion 64 ML-28 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,196 vs 1,201).

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium 3805U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-28 better than Pentium 3805U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 3805U is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-28 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-28 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 ML-28 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3805U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium 3805U vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 3805U

The Pentium 3805U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $161.

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 3805U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium 3805U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3805U versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 3805U. The Pentium 3805U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3805U scores 1,196 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion 64 ML-28. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3805U vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

Feature	Pentium 3805U	Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+19%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-84%	90 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,196	1,201

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3805U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium 3805U	Turion 64 ML-28
Socket	FCBGA1168	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium 3805U) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-28). The Pentium 3805U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Turion 64 ML-28 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium 3805U targets Mobile.