Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium 3805U

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium 3805U Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 / 2

1,205

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium 3805U

2 / 2

1,196

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium 3805U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium 3805U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-60

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 512W, a 402W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium 3805U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while Pentium 3805U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium 3805U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium 3805U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Athlon 64 FX-60 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,196 vs 1,205).
❌365.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 110W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 FX-60.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-60 better than Pentium 3805U?

Yes. Athlon 64 FX-60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 FX-60 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 FX-60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,031 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3805U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium 3805U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium 3805U

The Pentium 3805U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-60 and Pentium 3805U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3805U — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-60. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium 3805U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Pentium 3805U's 1,196 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-60. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-60 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3805U.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Pentium 3805U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+37%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	90 nm	14 nm-84%
Architecture	Toledo (2006)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	1,205	1,196
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	480	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 3805U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Pentium 3805U — the Pentium 3805U supports -500% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 3805U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-60) vs 12 (Pentium 3805U) — the Pentium 3805U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Pentium 3805U
Socket	939	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 64 FX-60 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) vs VT-x, VT-d (Pentium 3805U). The Pentium 3805U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast, Pentium 3805U targets Mobile.