Athlon 64 FX-60
VS
Phenom X3 8650

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Phenom X3 8650

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 Cores2 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8650

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-60 is positioned at rank 1119 and the Phenom X3 8650 is on rank 496, so the Phenom X3 8650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-60

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
266423%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
251744%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
182786%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
55066%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
43618%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
38157%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21855%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
21569%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
19639%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
19638%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
19418%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18894%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18630%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
18555%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
18386%
#1118
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
100%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
100%
#1120
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
99%
#1121
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
96%
#1122
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
94%
#1123
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
88%
#1124
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
86%
#1125
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
84%
#1126
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
82%
#1127
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
78%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
78%
#1130
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
76%
#1131
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
75%
#1132
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
72%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8650

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7678%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5267%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1587%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1257%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1100%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
630%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
622%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
566%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
566%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
560%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
544%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
537%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
535%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
530%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
96%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
96%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
95%
#496
Phenom X3 8650
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
99%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
97%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
96%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 64 FX-60 leads in gaming performance. However, the Phenom X3 8650 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-60Phenom X3 8650
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Toledo (2006) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 FX-60Phenom X3 8650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-60 and Phenom X3 8650

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Phenom X3 8650

The Phenom X3 8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,218 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8650 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8650 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X3 8650 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-60. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Phenom X3 8650 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Phenom X3 8650's 1,218 — a 1.1% lead for the Phenom X3 8650. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-60 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8650.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Phenom X3 8650
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+13%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Toledo (2006)
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,205
1,218+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
480
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom X3 8650 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Phenom X3 8650
Socket
939
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) / not specified (Phenom X3 8650). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Phenom X3 8650
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Gaming/Enthusiast