Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium E6700

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium E6700 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 / 2

1,205

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium E6700

2 / 2

1,219

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium E6700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium E6700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-60

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium E6700.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,205 vs 1,219).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($1,031 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.

Pentium E6700

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $945 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1112.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 FX-60.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E6700 better than Athlon 64 FX-60?

Yes. Pentium E6700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E6700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E6700 is the better buy right now. Pentium E6700 comes in $945 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $1,031 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1112.8% better value on MSRP (14.2 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium E6700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium E6700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium E6700

The Pentium E6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-60 and Pentium E6700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E6700 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E6700. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium E6700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Pentium E6700's 1,219 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium E6700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Pentium E6700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Toledo (2006)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,205	1,219+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	480	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E6700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus DDR3-1066 on the Pentium E6700 — the Pentium E6700 supports -366.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium E6700 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Pentium E6700
Socket	939	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 64 FX-60 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) vs VT-x (Pentium E6700). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast, Pentium E6700 targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Pentium E6700
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	None	VT-x
Target Use	Gaming/Enthusiast	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-60 was priced at $1031, while the Pentium E6700 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($1031 vs $86), Pentium E6700 was $945 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-60 delivers 1.2 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium E6700 — making the Pentium E6700 the 169.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Pentium E6700
MSRP	$1031	$86-92%
Performance per Dollar	1.2	14.2+1083%
Release Date	2006	2010

Search Athlon 64 FX-60 on Amazon

Search Pentium E6700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.