
Athlon 64 FX-60

Pentium N3540
Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium N3540 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium N3540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium N3540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 FX-60
2006Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium N3540.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,205 vs 1,207).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($1,031 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ❌5400% higher power demand at 110W vs 2W.
Pentium N3540
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $870 less on MSRP ($161 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 541.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 110W, a 108W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 FX-60.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium N3540 better than Athlon 64 FX-60?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Pentium N3540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-60
The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium N3540
The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3540 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium N3540 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Pentium N3540's 1,207 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium N3540. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-60 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-60 | Pentium N3540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.16 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Process | 90 nm | 22 nm-76% |
| Architecture | Toledo (2006) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,205 | 1,207 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 480 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium N3540 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-60 | Pentium N3540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) / not specified (Pentium N3540). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-60 | Pentium N3540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | None | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Enthusiast | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-60 was priced at $1031, while the Pentium N3540 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($1031 vs $161), Pentium N3540 was $870 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-60 delivers 1.2 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Pentium N3540 — making the Pentium N3540 the 146.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-60 | Pentium N3540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1031 | $161-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 7.5+525% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















