Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Turion 64 ML-28

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 / 2

1,205

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 ML-28

1 / 1

1,201

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-60

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 512W, a 402W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Turion 64 ML-28.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-28 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,201 vs 1,205).
❌365.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 110W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 FX-60.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-60 better than Turion 64 ML-28?

Yes. Athlon 64 FX-60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 FX-60 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 FX-60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,031 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 FX-60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon 64 FX-60 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-60. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+63%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Toledo (2006)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,205	1,201
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	480	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Turion 64 ML-28
Socket	939	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-28). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast.