Pentium 4 2.60
VS
Core Solo T1300

Pentium 4 2.60 vs Core Solo T1300

Intel

Pentium 4 2.60

1 Cores1 Thrd92 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2002
VS
Intel

Core Solo T1300

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 4 2.60 is positioned at rank 1128 and the Core Solo T1300 is on rank 1240, so the Pentium 4 2.60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 4 2.60

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
342544%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
323670%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
235011%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
70799%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
56080%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
49059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
28099%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
27732%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
25251%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
25248%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
24966%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
24292%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
23953%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
23856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
23640%
#1127
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
100%
#1128
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
100%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#1130
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
98%
#1131
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
97%
#1132
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
92%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
91%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
89%
#1135
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
81%
#1136
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
77%
#1137
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
76%
#1138
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
69%
#1139
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
63%
#1140
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
44%
#1141
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
20%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300

#1228
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
15946%
#1229
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
15712%
#1230
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
14424%
#1231
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
14359%
#1232
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
14227%
#1234
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
13739%
#1235
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
13174%
#1236
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
13152%
#1237
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
12799%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
100%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium 4 2.60 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Solo T1300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 5.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 4 2.60Core Solo T1300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core Solo T1300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 60% cheaper ($10 vs $25) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium 4 2.60Core Solo T1300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+164%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 4 2.60 and Core Solo T1300

Intel

Pentium 4 2.60

The Pentium 4 2.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 92 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 4 2.60 and Core Solo T1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.60 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 44.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.60. The Pentium 4 2.60 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Core Solo T1300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4 2.60 scores 365 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 5.3% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium 4 2.60Core Solo T1300
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+57%
1.66 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB+300%
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
365
385+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeaturePentium 4 2.60Core Solo T1300
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium 4 2.60 launched at $401 MSRP, while the Core Solo T1300 debuted at $209. At current prices ($25 vs $10), the Core Solo T1300 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 4 2.60 delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 38.5 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1300 — making the Core Solo T1300 the 90% better value option.

FeaturePentium 4 2.60Core Solo T1300
MSRP
$401
$209-48%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$10-60%
Performance per Dollar
14.6
38.5+164%
Release Date
2002
2006