Pentium 967
VS
Core i3-550

Pentium 967 vs Core i3-550

Intel

Pentium 967

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-550

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 967 is positioned at rank 1031 and the Core i3-550 is on rank 965, so the Core i3-550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 967

#1019
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2397%
#1020
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2362%
#1021
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2168%
#1022
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2158%
#1023
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2139%
#1025
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2065%
#1026
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1980%
#1027
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1977%
#1028
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1924%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
100%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
97%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
96%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
95%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24898%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18078%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5446%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3774%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2133%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1942%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1869%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1835%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1818%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
100%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
100%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
99%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
98%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
98%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
96%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
93%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-550 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 967 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 967Core i3-550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-550 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 50% cheaper ($5 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium 967Core i3-550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+99%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 967 and Core i3-550

Intel

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Core i3-550

The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

Processing Power

The Pentium 967 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-550's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 — a 84.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-550 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Pentium 967 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-550 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 967 scores 1,640 against the Core i3-550's 1,632 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium 967. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 967 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-550.

FeaturePentium 967Core i3-550
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz+146%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz+146%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,640
1,632
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,320
Geekbench 6 Single
437
Geekbench 6 Multi
899
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 967 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-550 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 967Core i3-550
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 967) / Yes (Core i3-550). The Core i3-550 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium 967 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeaturePentium 967Core i3-550
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium 967 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Core i3-550 debuted at $138. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Core i3-550 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 967 delivers 164.0 pts/$ vs 326.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-550 — making the Core i3-550 the 66.2% better value option.

FeaturePentium 967Core i3-550
MSRP
$134-3%
$138
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$5-50%
Performance per Dollar
164.0
326.4+99%
Release Date
2011
2010