Pentium 967
VS
Pentium G2010

Pentium 967 vs Pentium G2010

Intel

Pentium 967

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium G2010

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 967 is positioned at rank 1031 and the Pentium G2010 is on rank 669, so the Pentium G2010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 967

#1019
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2397%
#1020
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2362%
#1021
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2168%
#1022
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2158%
#1023
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2139%
#1025
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2065%
#1026
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1980%
#1027
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1977%
#1028
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1924%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
100%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
97%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
96%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
95%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G2010

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12157%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11488%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8341%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2513%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1990%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1741%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
997%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
984%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
896%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
896%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
886%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
862%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
850%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
847%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
839%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
100%
#669
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
100%
#671
Core i5-6500TE
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
100%
#673
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#674
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
100%
#675
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#677
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#678
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
99%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
99%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium G2010 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium 967 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium 967Pentium G2010
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium G2010 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 50% cheaper ($5 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium 967Pentium G2010
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+100%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 967 and Pentium G2010

Intel

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Pentium G2010

The Pentium G2010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,641 points. Launch price was $466.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 967 and Pentium G2010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G2010 — a 73.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G2010 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium 967 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G2010 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 967 scores 1,640 against the Pentium G2010's 1,641 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G2010. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 967 vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2010.

FeaturePentium 967Pentium G2010
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+115%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+115%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3072 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,640
1,641
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 967 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G2010 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 967Pentium G2010
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium 967 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Pentium G2010 debuted at $64. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Pentium G2010 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 967 delivers 164.0 pts/$ vs 328.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G2010 — making the Pentium G2010 the 66.7% better value option.

FeaturePentium 967Pentium G2010
MSRP
$134
$64-52%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$5-50%
Performance per Dollar
164.0
328.2+100%
Release Date
2011
2013