Atom N570 vs Pentium 967

Intel

Atom N570

2 Cores4 Thrd9 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 967

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Atom N570 vs Pentium 967 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N570 vs Pentium 967 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N570 vs Pentium 967: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N570

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 9W instead of 17W, a 8W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Pentium 967 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,630 vs 1,640).

Pentium 967

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Atom N570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 88.9% higher power demand at 17W vs 9W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom N570 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 967 better than Atom N570?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom N570 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium 967 is the better buy right now. Pentium 967 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Atom N570 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 967 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom N570 vs Pentium 967 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom N570

The Atom N570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

The Atom N570 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium 967's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom N570 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 — a 24.9% clock advantage for the Atom N570 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Atom N570 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium 967 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N570 scores 1,630 against the Pentium 967's 1,640 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium 967. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N570 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 967.

FeatureAtom N570Pentium 967
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.67 GHz+28%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz+28%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Pineview (2009−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,630
1,640
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N570 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 967 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom N570Pentium 967
Socket
FCBGA559
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N570 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Pentium 967 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom N570Pentium 967
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150